The US Congress Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The US Congress - Essay Example Representative Spector's site contained a similar voting demographic points; including banners, visiting DC, arrangements to military foundations and entry level positions; and really had one more than Lott - how to get awards. His landing page however was more packed and the significant theme catches were not as effectively unmistakable as Lott's; to his advantage, however, he had an email information exchange structure on the first page and his office areas and telephone numbers. In contrast to Lott's page however, Spector had no pursuit bar. The data on Wicker's landing page was scanty, best case scenario. His route catches were hard to peruse and little which could make it hard for a more seasoned individual. Additionally his principle theme catches had no drop down menus and as opposed to gathering classifications he such a large number of individual tabs. He had no hunt bar. In conclusion, Lewis' site page was set up pleasantly. His class catches were anything but difficult to find, in spite of the fact that they didn't have drop down menus. He did, be that as it may, have two hunt bars: one for general ventures and a Bill search which was imaginative. He didn't have a state map as did the two legislators. Each of the four of the congressman had a lot of factional data inside their sites, albeit some were more obtrusive than others. Lewis' landing page was primarily taken up with data on Bills, ventures or acts he was by and by associated with. In any case, his most recent news was dated January 18 which made me wonder what he had been accomplishing for a quarter of a year. Wicker's landing page devoted practically 50% of the landing page to storm alleviation help. The lower divide had current news discharge connects to his supported bills just as three segments he pens. Spector's most recent news was dated April sixth so data is being refreshed reasonably every now and again and like the others his news all managed enactments or councils is was effectively chipping away at. He had an article, be that as it may, about bipartisan collaboration in oil and gas value conversations. Finally, Lott's official statement segment was less jumbled with just one discharge showed and a catch to see more. He likewise had a connect to his week after week radio location which as indicated by the site he has been doing a week after week address since 1973. Of the four pages Lott had the least fanatic data depicted on the primary page. Every one of the four Congressmen have extensive life stories posted on their sites clarifying in detail the expert lives just as their experience and family data. Wicker has a broad photograph display. Lewis has the most brief life story of the four congressmen. One thing I didn't care for is the main section talked about his own protection business; ever the sales rep I assume. His photograph display was set up pleasantly with various headings to choose from which made it perfectly sorted out. Lott's account was pleasantly spread out with his primary headings marked. This permits the perusers to look over for the specific region they are looking for. Lott just had one photograph, his official Senate photograph. Spector's account was likewise pleasantly spread out clear and succinct with decent visual portrayals. Spector additionally had no photograph display which made me question in the event that it was a Senate ordered, a Senate informal command or only an incident. Of the complete appearance of the sites, by a long shot, the most engaging was that of Lott. He had much better utilization of room. The pages didn't appear as jumbled as that of Wicker and Lewis. Spector's page was spread out well as well,

Marie of France, Countess of Champagne

Marie of France, Countess of Champagne Known for: French princess whose birth was a mistake to guardians who needed a child to acquire the French seat Occupation: Countess of Champagne, official for her significant other and afterward for her child Dates: 1145 - March 11, 1198 Disarray with Marie de France, Poet In some cases mistook for Marie de France, Mary of France, a medieval writer of England in the twelfth century whose Lais of Marie de France get by alongside an interpretation of Aesops Fables into the English of the time and maybe others works. About Marie of France, Countess of Champagne Marie was destined to Eleanor of Aquitaine and Louis VII of France. That marriage was at that point flimsy when Eleanor brought forth a subsequent girl, Alix, in 1151, and the pair understood that they were not prone to have a child. Salic Law was deciphered to imply that a girl or little girls spouse couldn't acquire the crown of France. Eleanor and Louis had their marriage canceled in 1152, Eleanor left first for Aquitaine and afterward wedded the beneficiary to Englands crown, Henry Fitzempress. Alix and Marie were left in France with their dad and, later, stepmothers. Marriage In 1160, when Louis wedded his third spouse, Adã ¨le of Champagne, Louis pledged his little girls Alix and Marie to siblings of his new wife. Marie and Henry, Count of Champagne, were hitched in 1164. Henry went to battle in the Holy Land, leaving Marie as his official. While Henry was away, Maries stepbrother, Philip, succeeded their dad as lord, and held onto the dower terrains of his mom, Adã ¨le of Champagne, who was additionally Maries sister-iin-law. Marie and others joined Adã ¨le in restricting Philips activity; when Henry came back from the Holy Land, Marie and Philip had settled their contention. Widowhood At the point when Henry kicked the bucket in 1181, Marie filled in as official for their child, Henry II, until 1187. At the point when Henry II went to the Holy Land to battle in a campaign, Marie again filled in as official. Henry passed on in 1197, and Maries more youthful child Theobold succeeded him. Marie entered a religious community and kicked the bucket in 1198. Courts of Love Marie may have been a supporter of Andrã © le Chapelain (Andreas Capellanus), creator of one of the takes a shot at dignified love, as a clergyman who served Marie was named Andreas (and Chapelain or Capellanus implies minister). In the book, he credits decisions to Marie and to her mom, Eleanor of Aquitaine, among others. A few sources acknowledge the case that the book, De Amore and referred to in English as The Art of Courtly Love, was composed in line with Marie. There is no strong recorded proof that Marie of France with or without her mom managed at courts of adoration in France, however a few scholars have made that guarantee. Additionally known as: Marie Capet; Marie de France; Marie, Countess of Champagne Foundation, Family: Mother: Eleanor of AquitaineFather: Louis VII of France Stepmothers: Constance of Castile, at that point Adã ¨le of ChampagneFull kin: sister Alix, Countessâ of Blois; half kin (father Louis VII): Marguerite of France, Alys of France, Philip II of France, Agnes of France. She additionally had half-kin from her moms second marriage, however theres very little proof she associated with them. Marriage, Children: spouse: Henry I, Count of Champagne (wedded 1164)children:Scholastique of Champagne, wedded to William V of MaconHenry II of Champagne, 1166-1197Marie of Champagne, wedded to Baldwin I of ConstantinopleTheobald III of Champagne, 1179-1201

What Its Like To Major In Science Writing at MIT

What It’s Like To Major In Science Writing at MIT As some of you know, I got my masters degree from the Comparative Media Studies program at MIT. While I was a graduate student, CMS merged with Writing  to form CMS/W, which includes the Science Writing program and its associated undergraduate major/minor in Science Writing. According to CMS/W: The curriculum in science writing is designed to enable the student to develop mastery of the craft and rhetoric of writing about the worlds of science and engineering for broad audiences. This writing major is an option for students interested in science journalism, longer forms like the science documentary, and communication issues related to the public understanding of science and technology. It is also designed to work as a complementary major for students majoring in science, engineering, or another field of study at MIT. This major includes a three-subject exposure to an allied field such as science, or comparative media studies. Students also fulfill an internship requirement, which provides in-depth practical experience. Basically, Science Writing is supposed to train you to think and comment publicly on science and technology, i.e. to be a public intellectual. It nicely complements the scientific and technical training that an MIT education provides (see, e.g., Annas posts Writing is useful for science and Maybe its ok to be this way).  You can see the complementarity through the required coursework, like  21W.777 Science Writing in Contemporary Society: Drawing in part from their own interests and ideas, students write about science within various cultural contexts using an array of literary and reportorial tools. Studies the work of contemporary science writers, such as David Quammen and Atul Gawande, and examines the ways in which science and technology are treated in media and popular culture. Discussions focus on students writing and address topics such as false equivalency, covering controversy, and the attenuation of initial observations. Emphasizes long-form narratives; also looks at blogs, social media, and other modes of communication. Not a technical writing class. and 21W.778 Science Journalism: An introduction to print daily journalism and news writing, focusing on science news writing in general, and medical writing in particular. Emphasis is on writing clearly and accurately under deadline pressure. Class discussions involve the realities of modern journalism, how newsrooms function, and the science news coverage in daily publications. Discussions of, and practice in, interviewing and various modes of reporting. In class, students write numerous science news stories on deadline. My friend Seth Mnookin, who wrote a book about the anti-vaccination movement and an incredible New Yorker feature about hyperrare genetic diseases, is teaching  21W.737J Topics and Methods in 21st-Century Journalism this fall: Gives a broad understanding of what it means to produce journalism today. Evaluates the limitations and strengths of specific types of media, ranging from New York Times stories to Twitter feeds. Provides students with tools to effectively communicate their own work and research to non-specialist audiences. Students submit assignments via an online portal, which mimics the style and substance of an online news source. Students taking graduate version complete additional assignments. But what is it like to major in science writing at MIT? In addition to Annas posts, I wanted to share this reddit post by David B. 11, about his experience (unexpectedly) majoring in Science Writing and going on to become a science writer (among other things). Ive reproduced his post (with permission) unedited below: A bit of backstory: I originally went to MIT for biology. I thought I was going to be a genetic engineer. Ive always had a creative/expressive side as well though, and the two sides were kept very separate. As I got into my second year and started taking more of my course 7 major classes, I started to realize it wasnt for me. A perfect storm of bad academic performance, personal shit, and a nasty pneumonia resulted in me being asked to take a year off. If I came back, I had no idea how I was going to graduate in any reasonable time, and in which degree program. Before I left though, my advisor told me about the science writing program. It was a perfect mix of my science background and my expressive abilities and I wondered why noone had told me about the program sooner! A year later, I came back ready and raring to go. I had already completed all of my graduation prereqs, so it was just a matter of doing all of my major classes over the course of the next year and a half. This meant taking a course load of nearly all writing classes, four or five at a time, but I couldnt have been happier. I was succeeding, and even more, excelling. It was a lot of work, but it felt right. I graduated in 2011, and in just four academic years (plus the one year off). I learned that I didnt have to keep my intellectual and artistic sides separate, and I found a program that perfectly suited me. Writing at MIT is like anything else at MIT, first class. Your instructors are Pulitzer Prize winners and Hugo Award winners. My advisor had worked with PBS and Nova for years. I got to intern in the Harvard Public Relations Department working with and learning from a Pulitzer Prize winner that had been my professor the previous semester. MIT attracts the best and holds itself and its students to the highest standard, and the writing department is no exception. The program at MIT is different from other schools because you still get the MIT experience and culture. You have access to some of the greatest minds and facilities in the world and matriculate with some of the smartest, wildest people you will ever meet. Around the end of junior into senior year, a lot of people learn to stop worrying and love MIT, and those were some of the absolute best times of my life. Also, youll graduate with a Bachelor of Science in Writing, vs a BA from those wimpy liberal arts colleges. The biggest difference youll find is after graduating. While all your CS friends are going off to Google and Facebook, making six figures, times will be tougher for you. I will admit I had a lot of self doubt about the decisions I made and still do question if I made the right choice. But then I realize that Im following my passions and having a blast doing it. Ive always been a performer and wanted to end up in Hollywood as a writer/actor. I got a masters in creative writing for entertainment and moved to LA in April. Ive started working with a great production company and am learning the ropes and climbing a career ladder Ive always wanted to be on. Yes, money is tight. Yes, I sometimes wish course 6 was my thing and I was making bank. But I cant tell you how many times those friends of mine who are making six figures have told me they envy that Im following my passion and having fun for a living. You will notice a lot of weird stares from employers and questions about your resume (if you even get an interviewfuck the job market). Literally every interview Ive had, I get the question, you went to MIT? What are you doing here? But that sets you up for a fantastic response. What do you call a student with a course 6 degree and a student with a course 21W degree? MIT graduates. I turn that question back on them and explain that regardless of what degree anyone ends up with, they go through the MIT wringer. Late nights, hard work, overwhelming pressure and expectations. And no matter what course you take, MIT teaches you life lessons like how to learn and how to persevere in the face of overwhelming odds and how to find self confidence and how to be proactive and go after what you want (and a million more things). That response blows the interviewer away every time. In terms of what kind of jobs to look for, thats up to you. Youre only limited by what you can convince an employer you can do. Obviously with a science background, I was looking at Discovery Channel or Popular Science type things. I worked at a science center for a bit and probably could have run the place eventually if I didnt find it kind of depressing (it was run down and underfunded). Im guessing if youre pursuing a writing degree, you already have some jobs in mind. And it may not seem that the MIT name carries as much weight outside of the science circles, but youll find that smart people know what it is and will value you highly for it. My one bit of advice (and something I wish I had done) is to be proactive about finding jobs and internship opportunities before you graduate. Youll have so many opportunities available to you in that time right before and after graduation that will evaporate a year down the road. So many of my Harvard friends used their experience and the Har vard name to get awesome internships right out of college (The Onion, Colbert Report) and I didnt because I was so focused on just graduating. So reach out to the employers youre interested in as early as possible. If youre thinking about changing your major and youre passionate about writing, follow that passion. Now, if youre in high school looking to go to college for writing, I wouldnt say that MIT would be my first choice. Not that it isnt an incredible place and an incredible experience, but youd save yourself a hell of a lot of stress and sleepless nights by going somewhere else thats a bit more arts focused. The biggest lesson Ive learned though all of this is that everyone has their own path. Its sort of my mantra. Everyone has their own path. Youre gonna compare yourself to everyone around you, and youre going to doubt and second guess your decisions when times are tough. And youre going to get ignored time and time again by jobs and say WHAT THE HELL? I WENT TO MIT, DAMMIT. But everyone has their own path. So find your path.

What Its Like To Major In Science Writing at MIT

What It’s Like To Major In Science Writing at MIT As some of you know, I got my masters degree from the Comparative Media Studies program at MIT. While I was a graduate student, CMS merged with Writing  to form CMS/W, which includes the Science Writing program and its associated undergraduate major/minor in Science Writing. According to CMS/W: The curriculum in science writing is designed to enable the student to develop mastery of the craft and rhetoric of writing about the worlds of science and engineering for broad audiences. This writing major is an option for students interested in science journalism, longer forms like the science documentary, and communication issues related to the public understanding of science and technology. It is also designed to work as a complementary major for students majoring in science, engineering, or another field of study at MIT. This major includes a three-subject exposure to an allied field such as science, or comparative media studies. Students also fulfill an internship requirement, which provides in-depth practical experience. Basically, Science Writing is supposed to train you to think and comment publicly on science and technology, i.e. to be a public intellectual. It nicely complements the scientific and technical training that an MIT education provides (see, e.g., Annas posts Writing is useful for science and Maybe its ok to be this way).  You can see the complementarity through the required coursework, like  21W.777 Science Writing in Contemporary Society: Drawing in part from their own interests and ideas, students write about science within various cultural contexts using an array of literary and reportorial tools. Studies the work of contemporary science writers, such as David Quammen and Atul Gawande, and examines the ways in which science and technology are treated in media and popular culture. Discussions focus on students writing and address topics such as false equivalency, covering controversy, and the attenuation of initial observations. Emphasizes long-form narratives; also looks at blogs, social media, and other modes of communication. Not a technical writing class. and 21W.778 Science Journalism: An introduction to print daily journalism and news writing, focusing on science news writing in general, and medical writing in particular. Emphasis is on writing clearly and accurately under deadline pressure. Class discussions involve the realities of modern journalism, how newsrooms function, and the science news coverage in daily publications. Discussions of, and practice in, interviewing and various modes of reporting. In class, students write numerous science news stories on deadline. My friend Seth Mnookin, who wrote a book about the anti-vaccination movement and an incredible New Yorker feature about hyperrare genetic diseases, is teaching  21W.737J Topics and Methods in 21st-Century Journalism this fall: Gives a broad understanding of what it means to produce journalism today. Evaluates the limitations and strengths of specific types of media, ranging from New York Times stories to Twitter feeds. Provides students with tools to effectively communicate their own work and research to non-specialist audiences. Students submit assignments via an online portal, which mimics the style and substance of an online news source. Students taking graduate version complete additional assignments. But what is it like to major in science writing at MIT? In addition to Annas posts, I wanted to share this reddit post by David B. 11, about his experience (unexpectedly) majoring in Science Writing and going on to become a science writer (among other things). Ive reproduced his post (with permission) unedited below: A bit of backstory: I originally went to MIT for biology. I thought I was going to be a genetic engineer. Ive always had a creative/expressive side as well though, and the two sides were kept very separate. As I got into my second year and started taking more of my course 7 major classes, I started to realize it wasnt for me. A perfect storm of bad academic performance, personal shit, and a nasty pneumonia resulted in me being asked to take a year off. If I came back, I had no idea how I was going to graduate in any reasonable time, and in which degree program. Before I left though, my advisor told me about the science writing program. It was a perfect mix of my science background and my expressive abilities and I wondered why noone had told me about the program sooner! A year later, I came back ready and raring to go. I had already completed all of my graduation prereqs, so it was just a matter of doing all of my major classes over the course of the next year and a half. This meant taking a course load of nearly all writing classes, four or five at a time, but I couldnt have been happier. I was succeeding, and even more, excelling. It was a lot of work, but it felt right. I graduated in 2011, and in just four academic years (plus the one year off). I learned that I didnt have to keep my intellectual and artistic sides separate, and I found a program that perfectly suited me. Writing at MIT is like anything else at MIT, first class. Your instructors are Pulitzer Prize winners and Hugo Award winners. My advisor had worked with PBS and Nova for years. I got to intern in the Harvard Public Relations Department working with and learning from a Pulitzer Prize winner that had been my professor the previous semester. MIT attracts the best and holds itself and its students to the highest standard, and the writing department is no exception. The program at MIT is different from other schools because you still get the MIT experience and culture. You have access to some of the greatest minds and facilities in the world and matriculate with some of the smartest, wildest people you will ever meet. Around the end of junior into senior year, a lot of people learn to stop worrying and love MIT, and those were some of the absolute best times of my life. Also, youll graduate with a Bachelor of Science in Writing, vs a BA from those wimpy liberal arts colleges. The biggest difference youll find is after graduating. While all your CS friends are going off to Google and Facebook, making six figures, times will be tougher for you. I will admit I had a lot of self doubt about the decisions I made and still do question if I made the right choice. But then I realize that Im following my passions and having a blast doing it. Ive always been a performer and wanted to end up in Hollywood as a writer/actor. I got a masters in creative writing for entertainment and moved to LA in April. Ive started working with a great production company and am learning the ropes and climbing a career ladder Ive always wanted to be on. Yes, money is tight. Yes, I sometimes wish course 6 was my thing and I was making bank. But I cant tell you how many times those friends of mine who are making six figures have told me they envy that Im following my passion and having fun for a living. You will notice a lot of weird stares from employers and questions about your resume (if you even get an interviewfuck the job market). Literally every interview Ive had, I get the question, you went to MIT? What are you doing here? But that sets you up for a fantastic response. What do you call a student with a course 6 degree and a student with a course 21W degree? MIT graduates. I turn that question back on them and explain that regardless of what degree anyone ends up with, they go through the MIT wringer. Late nights, hard work, overwhelming pressure and expectations. And no matter what course you take, MIT teaches you life lessons like how to learn and how to persevere in the face of overwhelming odds and how to find self confidence and how to be proactive and go after what you want (and a million more things). That response blows the interviewer away every time. In terms of what kind of jobs to look for, thats up to you. Youre only limited by what you can convince an employer you can do. Obviously with a science background, I was looking at Discovery Channel or Popular Science type things. I worked at a science center for a bit and probably could have run the place eventually if I didnt find it kind of depressing (it was run down and underfunded). Im guessing if youre pursuing a writing degree, you already have some jobs in mind. And it may not seem that the MIT name carries as much weight outside of the science circles, but youll find that smart people know what it is and will value you highly for it. My one bit of advice (and something I wish I had done) is to be proactive about finding jobs and internship opportunities before you graduate. Youll have so many opportunities available to you in that time right before and after graduation that will evaporate a year down the road. So many of my Harvard friends used their experience and the Har vard name to get awesome internships right out of college (The Onion, Colbert Report) and I didnt because I was so focused on just graduating. So reach out to the employers youre interested in as early as possible. If youre thinking about changing your major and youre passionate about writing, follow that passion. Now, if youre in high school looking to go to college for writing, I wouldnt say that MIT would be my first choice. Not that it isnt an incredible place and an incredible experience, but youd save yourself a hell of a lot of stress and sleepless nights by going somewhere else thats a bit more arts focused. The biggest lesson Ive learned though all of this is that everyone has their own path. Its sort of my mantra. Everyone has their own path. Youre gonna compare yourself to everyone around you, and youre going to doubt and second guess your decisions when times are tough. And youre going to get ignored time and time again by jobs and say WHAT THE HELL? I WENT TO MIT, DAMMIT. But everyone has their own path. So find your path.